Stronger Issues, Weaker Predispositions : Abortion, Gay Rights, and Authoritarianism

Political psychologists have long theorized that authoritarianism structures the positions people take on cultural issues and their party ties.

Authoritarianism is durable; it resists the influence of other political judgments; and it is very impactful-in a word, it is strong.

By contrast, researchers characterize the attitudes most people hold on most issues as unstable and ineffectual-in a word, weak.

But what is true of most issues is not true of the issues that have driven America's long running culture war-abortion and gay rights.

This Element demonstrates that moral issue attitudes are stronger than authoritarianism.

With data from multiple sources over the period 1992-2020, it shows that (1) moral issue attitudes endure longer than authoritarianism; (2) moral issues predict change in authoritarianism; (3) authoritarianism does not systematically predict change in moral issues; and (4) moral issues have always played a much greater role structuring party ties than authoritarianism.