Superior Beings. If They Exist, How Would We Know? : Game-Theoretic Implications of Omnipotence, Omniscience, Immortality, and Incomprehensibility

The same is true of applications of game theory to history, philosophy religion, and the other humanities.

In particular, I know of no attempts to apply game theory to the kinds of p- losophy-of-religion and theology questions that I explored in Superior Beings, By contrast; the nexus between science and religion has been thoroughly analyzed using other methods of inquiry as evidenced by Charles L.

Harper Jr (ed. ), Spiritual Information: 100 Perspectives on Science and Religion (West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press, 2006), a huge collection put together in honor of Sir John Templeton's ninetieth birthday Sir John, through the Templeton Foundation, is the primary propo- nent and the major benefactor of studies in science and religion today How science and religion are (or are not) connected is, of course, an old subject.

It is also a controversial one, extending at least from Galileo's trial in 1633 to the teaching of evolution today.

While game theory is a mathematical theory, Superior Beings is emphatically not a scientific work, wherein a theory is tested.

Rather, it is an attempt to interpret and explain important philo- sophical, religious, and theological questions in terms of the rational choices of ordinary human beings, who are assumed to play games with a superior being.

The game theory I use is nonstandard.