Creation ethics: reproduction, genetics, and quality of life

The ethics of creating-or declining to create-human beings has been addressed in several contexts: debates over abortion and embryo research; literature on "self-creation"; and discussions of procreative rights and responsibilities, genetic engineering, and future generations.

Here, for the first time, is a sustained, scholarly analysis of all of these issues-a discussion combining breadth of topics with philosophical depth, imagination with current scientificunderstanding, argumentative rigor with accessibility.

The overarching aim of Creation Ethics is to illuminate a broad array of issues connected with reproduction and genetics, through the lens of moral philosophy.

With novel frameworks for understanding prenatal moral status and human identity, andexceptional fairness to those holding different views, David DeGrazia sheds new light on the ethics of abortion and embryo research, genetic enhancement and prenatal genetic interventions, procreation and parenting, and decisions that affect the quality of life of future generations.

Along the way, he helpfully introduces personal identity theory and value theory as well as such complex topics as moral status, wrongful life, and the "nonidentity problem." The results include a subjectiveaccount of human well-being, a standard for responsible procreation and parenting, and a theoretical bridge between consequentialist and nonconsequentialist ethical theories.

The upshot is a synoptic, mostly liberal vision of the ethics of creating human beings. "This is a valuable book on a fascinating topic, written by a major figure in the field.

The topic of the ethics of creating people is both practically urgent, as new technologies develop for shaping human offspring, and also of great theoretical importance for ethics and meta-ethics because it engages the deepest issues, including those of moral status, the nature of justice, and identity.

DeGrazia has already proved to be an important force in shaping the debate regarding these issues.

Anyonewriting on this topic will have to address this book head-on.

The style is remarkably lucid and almost jargon-free.

Given that the book is filled with complex, sustained argumentation, this is quite an accomplishment.

This book will be of interest to legal scholars, philosophers working in normativeethics, meta-ethics, and bioethics, and public policy scholars." - Allen Buchanan, James B.

Duke Professor of Philosophy, Duke University