Image for Choosing Your Battles

Choosing Your Battles : American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force ([New ed.])

See all formats and editions

America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps.

Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war.

This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional.

Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war, showing how civil-military debates and concerns about sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign policy in profound ways.

Read More
Special order line: only available to educational & business accounts. Sign In
£28.00 Save 20.00%
RRP £35.00
Product Details
Princeton University Press
0691124272 / 9780691124278
Paperback / softback
11/09/2005
United States
English
xiii, 250 p.
24 cm
research & professional /academic/professional/technical Learn More
Previous ed.: 2004.
One of those rare works of political science that speaks directly and aptly to an issue of policy. Feaver and Gelpi show that the conventional wisdom about attitudes to military engagement and casualties is, and has been, wrong. More importantly, they explain why. One of the most important contributions to the literature on civil-military relations in years. -- Eliot Cohen, author of "Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartime" For half a century, demands of mobilization for World War and Cold War put large percentages of Americans through military service. The abrupt end
One of those rare works of political science that speaks directly and aptly to an issue of policy. Feaver and Gelpi show that the conventional wisdom about attitudes to military engagement and casualties is, and has been, wrong. More importantly, they explain why. One of the most important contributions to the literature on civil-military relations in years. -- Eliot Cohen, author of "Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartime" For half a century, demands of mobilization for World War and Cold War put large percentages of Americans through military service. The abrupt end 1KBB USA, JPS International relations